Jump to content


Super Premium
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About MercsInBoxes™

  • Rank
  • Birthday 03/11/1998

Contact Methods

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

1873 profile views
  1. And of course this isn't totally been suggested a hundred times before! Doing so will not benefit anything but those too lazy and greedy who can't even spare 10 seconds entering and clicking the enter button. Don't be lazy
  2. A something for fellow vault hunters :wubwub: https://i.imgur.com/ts89gHY.png
  3. Just like the others said: It's an impersonator pretending to be a bot in order to steal your wrench. Decline, block and report the profile, bots NEVER send trade offers without reason in any circumstances.
  4. What you're suggesting is literally a lootbox mechanic which is now considered gambling: -You purchase the crate of any tier you desire -Pay a hefty fee first before receiving the crates, or in this case pay first before receiving the items -Chances are that you'll either lose or earn more value from what you paid for that specific "box"-Keep in mind the reason is that the economy is constantly changing. We already have an option to purchase random craft hats in bulk, and honestly there's no point purchasing random items and receive items in full/near value, while we can outright purchase the items themselves, and it would cause problems.
  5. No This has been suggested many times and will never be implemented for obvious reasons, as it would discourage rafflers to create messages and the interaction within the community, it won't benefit anything whatsoever. Don't be lazy.
  6. :rayman: https://i.imgur.com/WZyFjhN.png<-- APNG file
  7. :panic: https://i.imgur.com/K2fQTx4.png :reanimate: https://i.imgur.com/iFJBQPJ.png<--APNG file
  8. And how would it make it "easier"? Because multiple winners=Higher chance of winning? In all seriousness though I don't see how it would benefit users, since most raffles are almost exactly the same in terms of structure, and entries being the major factor when it comes to choosing winners. Adding a filter of single/multiple winners on the raffle section would do nothing but add more burden, as we already have specific raffle type filters on Joined/Won raffles.
  9. -Using scripts to instantly enter all raffles are strictly prohibited and are automatically banned from the site . There's always people that camp on the site just to enter every raffle they see, so they're most likely just normal users camping than actual bots. And occasionally there's honeypot raffles to catch said bots! -That's unnecessary burden, all raffles are free to join by EVERYONE regardless of experience. -That's everyone's default settings, and there's a reason it is to why: To avoid being contacted by scammers when the winner wins a very expensive item to protect their privacy. Also calling people with private profiles hackers and scammers is a bit ridiculous: They want privacy or they they're not even aware of it.
  10. :kubrow: https://i.imgur.com/iFuXk2h.png :clem: https://i.imgur.com/o5RfODJ.png :bandicute: https://i.imgur.com/sbxhgML.png
  11. Latest patch seems to bug the system: I can select Steam items just fine, but whenever I hit the create raffle button, it doesn't "detect" these items despite being selected and tradeable. As you can see here: They're selected, meaning it should be tradeable yet the system fails to properly "read" it and thus making them "nonexistent" to the system. This applies to all backgrounds, cards and emoticons.
  12. Updated some more emotes :kutku: http://i.imgur.com/8g9Ic4W.png :chacha: http://i.imgur.com/F6LOPlA.png :felyne: http://i.imgur.com/CBp3eUI.png :janstare: http://i.imgur.com/HmkQg2S.png
  13. Well time to move on to next gen graphics huh? All emotes are 96x96! :bandicoot: ===> http://i.imgur.com/VmOeCG7.png :akuaku: ===> http://i.imgur.com/uYuTkKL.png :drcortex: ===> http://i.imgur.com/1ztc1qW.png :melynx: http://i.imgur.com/9FtXkow.png
  14. ...Or how about instead allow the Megaraffle to rule readers only instead? And paying to enter is pretty unfair.
  15. Users that failed to pay auctions got a 1 week ban, the next a month and the third permanently. Having a permanent ban just because they failed to pay ONCE is pretty excessive and unnecessary :/
  • Create New...