This clarified some things, and I cannot disagree with the reason of banning Pillzman, I don't see any text edit and really surprises me what kind of "person" he is. However, there are still A LOT of holes on both sides, and because one of them is silenced for X behaviours, I also want to ask one thing: I saw a lot of attack messages from certain members on the posts of the users who where attacking you, but mostly from a certain user who has been attacking them and defending you, but instead of doing like you and giving evidence of why he disregarded about the opposite opinions, he (or she idk) has just went insulting and attacking anyone who didn't thinked the same of you. And if you X user who went agressive towards that users are reading this, even if they are wrong or not, no matter in what problem, as I always say: going agressively attacking other people is NOT the way to confront a conflict. Verbal insults and other are NOT the way to solve problems. If you disregard with somebody, and most importantly if they're dangerous or can easily get angry, don't just go "Your evidence is [redacted] [redacted] you the owner of the site has the right to ban you you [redacted]", give proper evidence of why you don't agree with them and don't stalk or attack every single person who posts something against someone or somebody. The best way to confront this kind of situation is with calm and patience, not by force (no matter if is verbal or physic).